Legal Opinion

Korrady v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1892No. 15,112PublishedCited by 43 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The appellee’s contention that, the complaint is bad' because it does not specifically show that actual damages were sustained by the widow and infant children of the appellant’s intestate can not prevail. Where a complaint charges a railroad company with wrongfully killing a person, shows that the person so killed was free from contributory fault, and that he left a widow and infant children surviving him, a cause of action is stated, although it is not directly alleged that the surviving kin folks sustained actual damages. The legal presumption is that infant children are entitled to the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Toledo & Wabash Railway Co. v. GoddardIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Oleson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BurtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. William Laurie Co. v. McCulloughIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Wabash Railroad v. McNownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Matchett v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API