Billman v. Indianapolis, Cincinnati & Lafayette Railroad
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Shelby Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
This appeal presents the question of the sufficiency of the complaint of appellant, by whom this action was instituted.
It is unnecessary to do more than state, in bare outline, the allegations of the complaint, for the objections urged against it here, and which prevailed against it in the trial court, are of such a character as to require only a very general statement from us. It is alleged that the servants and agents of the appellee managed and opei’ated the locomotive and cars of the railway company in such a recklessly and culpaWy negligent manner, as to wilfully and wrongfully cause a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Hill v. WinsorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Ryan v. . New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Vandenburgh v. TruaxNew York Supreme Court · 1847
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Binford v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. PitzerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Louisville Home Telephone Co. v. GasperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.