Tyson v. Richardson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: D. H. JohNsoN, Circuit Judge. The action was commenced to quiet the title to some valuable real estate in the city of Milwaukee. The question involved was whether plaintiff was the owner in fee of such’ property or only a life interest, and her infant children, Virginia C. Tyson and Juliet C. Tyson, the estate in remainder, subject to some contingencies not necessary to specially mention.
Read the full summary
Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: D. H. JohNsoN, Circuit Judge. The action was commenced to quiet the title to some valuable real estate in the city of Milwaukee. The question involved was whether plaintiff was the owner in fee of such’ property or only a life interest, and her infant children, Virginia C. Tyson and Juliet C. Tyson, the estate in remainder, subject to some contingencies not necessary to specially mention. In due form of law Hamilton P. Richardson, a member of the bar of said court, was duly appointed guardian of the infant defendants, and…
1Opinion of the CourtMaeshall, J.
It was the duty of the court or judge, or some officer authorized by law to perform the duties of judicial administration in the action, to appoint a guardian ad Utem for the infant defendants, and such guardian was required to be an officer of the court fully competent to understand and protect the rights of the defendants, and in no way connected in business with the attorneys for the adverse party, and of sufficient financial ability to compensate the infants for any loss that might be sustained by them through his neglect or misconduct in attending to their defense. Circuit Court Rule IX,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gott v. CookNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
- Union Insurance v. Van RensselaerNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
- Tyson v. TysonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Sheahan v. Judge of Wayne CircuitMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Tyson v. TysonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cowie v. StrohmeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Puhl v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Stutsman v. SharplessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Frame v. PlumbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Richardson v. TysonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.