Legal Opinion

Tyson v. Tyson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1896PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: I). H. Johnson, Circuit Judge. Motion by Rollin B. Mallory, general guardian, for substitution; motion by II. P. Richardson, guardian ad litem., for leave to file undertaking in this court; motion by the respondent to dismiss the appeal. The facts on which the several motions are based are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, J.

On the 19th day of November, 1814, Robert II. Cabell executed a trust deed, which was thereafter duly recorded, purporting to convey valuable real estate,, owned by him in the city of Milwaukee, to trustees therein named, for the benefit of the grantor during his life, remainder to his daughter, plaintiff Virginia C. Tyson, during-*227her life, and remainder over, under certain contingencies, to her children then unborn, now the infant defendants Virginia Odbell Tyson and Juliet Catharine Tyson. Thereafter such grantor died, leaving a will purporting to devise such real estate in accordance with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  2. Stunz v. StunzIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. White v. PolleysWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Sprague v. BeamerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  5. Punch v. Town of New BerlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Richardson v. TysonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Estate of KochWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  4. In re Luscombe's WillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Tyson v. RichardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API