Palmer v. President of Hartford
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Relator applied for a mandamus to compel respondents to approve a liquor-dealer’s bond. Tbe facts are stated in the opinion. .
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This is a petition for mandamus to compel the president and trustees of - the village of Hartford to approve a liquor bond.
The claim made by the petition is that relator is a resident of Hartford, Van Burén county, and that on June 25, 1888, he made and executed a liquor bond, as provided by the statute, with Clark Samson and Ira W. Allen as sureties thereon; that said sureties- both justified under oath as - required by law in a sum equal to the penalty of said bond, which justification was duly indorsed on said bond, in all respects in accordance with *97the provision of the statute in such…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Post v. Township Board of SpartaMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- McHenry v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bailey v. Van Buren Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Divine v. Board of TrusteesMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Farr v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1904