McHenry v. Township Board
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus to compel respondent to approve a liquor bond. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
This case is an application to this Court for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to approve of a druggist’s liquor bond; the same being fixed by the board at $3,000.
An order to show cause was granted, and the case is now before us on the return of the township board, after an *10opportunity has been given, under the direction of this Court,, to said relators to be heard.
The return shows that, after hearing the testimony of therelators and their witnesses in the case, and mature deliberation had thereon by the board, they found one o£ the sureties-upon said bond offered for approval,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Post v. Township Board of SpartaMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by4 opinions
- Winter v. Royal Oak City ManagerMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Bailey v. Van Buren Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Palmer v. President of HartfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Divine v. Board of TrusteesMichigan Supreme Court · 1899