Farr v. Anderson
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to Osceola; McAlvay, J. Mandamus by Alta Farr to compel Thomas Anderson: and others, president and trustees of the village of Tustin, to approve a liquor bond. From an order granting the writ, respondents bring certiorari.
1DissentGrant, J.
This is a petition presented to the circuit court to compel the respondents, members of the common council of the village of Tustin, to approve relator’s liquor bond. The answer to the petition alleges that the respondents acted in good faith, and that the bond was rejected because of the insufficiency of Mr. Farr, one of the sureties. A replication was filed to the answer, and by the order of the court, against the objection and exception of the respondents, seven issues of fact were framed, as follows:
“1. Has the common council acted in good faith in rejecting the liquor bond of the relator?
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Amperse v. WinslowMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Parker v. Board of TrusteesMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Wolfson v. Board of RubiconMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Bailey v. Van Buren Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Palmer v. President of HartfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.