Legal Opinion

Post v. Township Board of Sparta

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1886PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Mandamus to compel approval of liquor bond. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, O. J.

This application is for a mandamus to compel the approval of a liquor bond. The chief grounds of complaint were the alleged unreasonable conduct of the board in conducting an investigation into the property of the sureties of the applicant, and in their excluding from consideration the personal property of the sureties, and that their action was inquisitorial, and for the purpose of enabling the assessing officer of the township to enlarge their assessment.

The answer, which is not put in issue, and must be accepted as true, denies that the board’s action was based on any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wolfson v. Board of RubiconMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McLeod v. State Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Kosiba v. Wayne County Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Terre Haute Brewing Co. v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Brophy v. SchindlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Olds v. Commissioner of State Land OfficeMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API