Legal Opinion

State v. Gangi

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 18, 1984No. 10-82-06545; CA A28387PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In this criminal case, defendant was found not responsible for the crime of theft in the first degree by reason of mental disease or defect. In the dispositional phase of the case, ORS 161.325(1), the court, instead of ordering that defendant be placed under the jurisdiction of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (ORS 161.327) or discharged (ORS 161.329), ordered the case “continued” for a period not to exceed five years or until defendant could show he was entitled to discharge. Defendant appeals, seeking discharge under ORS 161.329. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

We agree…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. KoenneckeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. HoareCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. State v. ThreetOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. SieckmannOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. HattersleyOregon Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BranstetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. State v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. BranstetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. State v. BranstetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API