Legal Opinion

Clairton Corp. v. Geo-Con, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1993No. 00082PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County denying appellant Clair-ton Corporation’s (Lessor) motion for post-trial relief. We affirm.

Lessor and appellee Geo-Con, Inc. (Tenant) were parties to a commercial lease for a business premises located in Monroe-ville, Pennsylvania. The lease was for a term of two years. At the expiration of the two-year term, which was September 15, 1990, Tenant, with the consent of Lessor, remained on the premises for approximately seven months. During that time, Tenant continued to pay the same monthly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Murtland v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Reading Terminal Merchants Ass'n v. Samuel Rappaport AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Peterson v. SchultzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Pittsburgh v. Charles Zubik & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Routman v. BohmSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jarl Investments, L.P. v. FleckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Wilmington Trust Co. v. County of AlleghenyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. 222 South Manoa v. Lavin, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Federal Realty Invest. v. Rao 8, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Joseph B. Dahlkemper Co. v. Liberatore (In re Joseph B. Dahlkemper Co.)District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API