Legal Opinion

Reading Terminal Merchants Ass'n v. Samuel Rappaport Associates

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 4, 1983No. 1380 and 1381PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

In this consolidated action we are asked to determine the obligations of hold over tenants after they have been notified of a change in the terms of their lease but before they have agreed to that change.

The facts, largely stipulated by the parties, relate to the area in Philadelphia between Arch and Filbert streets, at Twelfth street, popularly known as the Reading Terminal Market. The Reading Terminal merchants have contributed variety and color to the city’s downtown area since before the turn of the present century, offering an abundance of excellent fresh foods and unusual…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Witmer v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Fried v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Greek v. WylieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Sferra v. UrlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Northern Liberties Gas Co. v. United Gas Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Dorn v. Stanhope Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. USX Corp. v. Prime Leasing Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Housing Authority v. James (In Re James)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Clairton Corp. v. Geo-Con, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API