Legal Opinion

Routman v. Bohm

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1961No. Appeal, No. 231PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

This is an appeal from the entry of judgment on the pleadings in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants for $900 in an assumpsit action to recover rent.

Samuel, Jennie and Louis Routman, plaintiffs herein, leased a storeroom in Sharon to Samuel and Sarah Bohm, defendants herein, for a term of three years commencing April 1, 1956, for a total rental of $16,200, payable in equal monthly installments of $450 on the first day of each month during the term.

The lease was in writing and contained the following provision: “The lessees hereby waive the usual three…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Murtland v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Williams v. LadewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Adams v. DunnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Hemphill v. FlynnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
  5. Bakewell v. TurnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Witmer v. Exxon Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. MacK v. FennellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Clairton Corp. v. Geo-Con, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Pagano v. REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ETC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Wilmington Trust Co. v. County of AlleghenyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API