Dollard v. Koronsky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Albert H. Dollard, from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, bearing date the 21st day of March, 1910, and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York, reversing an order of the Oity Court, entered in the office of the clerk of said court on the 9th day of October, 1909, which adjudged Max' E. Bloch guilty of contempt of court and provided for punishment therefor.
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, J.:
We find ourselves forced to the conclusion that the respondent’s conduct, reprehensible though it was, did not constitute a contempt of court. On June 24, 1908, he signed an undertaking in order to release the levy of an execution against the property of one Koronsky. He then swore that he was worth $2,800 over and above all debts and liabilities, and his undertaking was that Koronsky would pay any judgment that might be obtained against him in the action. A judgment was obtained, the respondent refused to pay it, and the plaintiff had judgment against him. Being examined upon…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dollard v. KoronskyNew York Supreme Court · 1910
- Dollard v. KoronskyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1909
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pease v. Charlotte Hungerford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Bridgman v. American Book Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Gold Sign Co. v. CosmasAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1925
- Bartholomay Brewery Co. v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Blatt v. RaeNew York Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.