Dollard v. Koronsky
City of New York Municipal Court
Motion to punish a surety upon a court undertaking, for contempt of court, for the offense of fraudulently divesting himself of his property for the purpose of rendering futile and nugatory the proceedings of the court.
Read the full summary
Motion to punish a surety upon a court undertaking, for contempt of court, for the offense of fraudulently divesting himself of his property for the purpose of rendering futile and nugatory the proceedings of the court. Motion granted and the offender fined $1,400 (the amount of the undertaking) and $720 (the amount of expenses incurred in prosecuting the contempt motion), in all $2,120; the offender also committed to jail for two months, absolutely, and thence further until the fine be paid.
1Opinion of the CourtDelehanty, J.
This is a motion by plaintiff to adjudge guilty and punish as for a contempt of court Max E. Bloch, a surety upon an undertaking ordered by the court to be given for the protection of the plaintiff, as a condition of releasing by the court a levy of an execution against the property of Benjamin Koronsky, in plaintiff’s favor, for the offense of fraudulently divesting himself of his property, for the unlawful purpose of making nugatory the said protectory provision of said order and of impairing, impeding, prejudicing and defeating plaintiff’s lawful rights and remedies in this action.
A…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Platt v. . RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- In re GoslinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Burnham v. DenikeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Greite v. HendricksNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Dollard v. KoronskyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dollard v. KoronskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910