Legal Opinion

Butterfield v. MacKenzie

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 1998No. 24298PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZMAN, Judge.

Guy E. and Mary D. Butterfield appeal from the district court’s decision granting Betty Jean MacKenzie’s motion for summary judgment. The court held that the relevant statute of limitations for the Butterfields’ cause of action had expired. We affirm.

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

On November 7, 1989, the Butterfields loaned $12,000 to MaeKenzie, who signed a promissory note which stated that the entire sum plus 12 percent annual interest was: “All due and payable April 15, 1990.” It is uneontested that no payments of interest or principal have ever been made on the loan.

A…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Conchemco, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Farmers National Bank v. ShireyIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Corbridge v. Clark Equipment Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Jones v. WatsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Summerrise v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. JoehnkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Noreen v. PRICE DEVELOPMENT CO.Idaho Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Holly Galbraith v. Emily FairbanksWyoming Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Butterfield v. MacKenzieIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API