Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 24, 1997No. 2-96-112-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant was a juvenile at the time of the commission of the instant offense. He was indicted and tried for murder. He was convicted by a jury of murder, after being certified to stand trial as an adult, and the jury assessed punishment at life confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division and a fine of $10,000. In this appeal, appellant brings five points of error to this court. We reverse and remand for a new punishment hearing.

Although neither legal nor factual sufficiency of the evidence is challenged, a brief summary of the facts is helpful to…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Rachal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Adanandus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. DuBose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Sterling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Simpson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Hohn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1997
  4. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Simpson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API