Legal Opinion

Simpson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 16, 1998No. 1277-97PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION ON APPELLANTS PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Opinion of the Court · KellerKeller, Judge

in which McCORMICK, Presiding Judge, and MANSFIELD, HOLLAND and WOMACK, Judges, joined.

Appellant was convicted of indecency with a child. During trial, the State offered evidence of extraneous offenses committed by appellant against the victim. Before the trial court, the State maintained that these offenses were admissible under Article 38.37 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.1 Before the Court of Appeals, appellant contended that the evidence was inadmissible because Article 38.37 was inapplicable and because the State failed to…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lankston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Dufrene v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997

4Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Webber v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  3. Randon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  4. Hartson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  5. Ewing v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API