Legal Opinion
Moton v. City of Phoenix
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 20, 1966No. 8533PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McFarland, justice.
Isaac P. Moton and Geraldine Moton, ap-pellants, hereinafter designated plaintiffs, filed a complaint in inverse eminent domain in Superior Court, Maricopa County, on May 11, 1964, against the City of Phoenix, a municipal corporation, hereinafter designated the city, seeking compensation for the destruction of certain improvements on property. Plaintiffs appeal from the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of the city.
Plaintiffs are the owners of lot 16, block 1, Collins Addition, Phoenix, on which was located prior to 1961 improvements consisting of rental…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rowe v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
- Adamec v. PostNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Boden v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Hislop v. RodgersArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- City of Louisville v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rubi v. 49'er Country Club Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Third & Catalina Associates v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Bonito Partners, LLC v. City of FlagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Holmes v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals and ReviewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.