Legal Opinion
City of Louisville v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided September 30, 1960PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALMORE, Judge.
This is a declaratory judgment proceeding challenging the validity of so-called “hot bath” ordinances adopted by the City of Louisville in 19S6 as amendments to its “Minimum Standards for Habitable Buildings” ordinance of 1954, and questioning also a further amendment, adopted in 1957, providing for exemptions in hardship cases. The attack is made by class representatives of (a) the various owners and occupants of property affected by the legislation and (b) real estate agents who, in representing such owners, are also subject to it.
The judgment of the trial court declared…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Gorieb v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. TranbargerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Queenside Hills Realty Co. v. SaxlSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hutchinson v. City of ValdostaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- 421 Corp. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Moore v. WardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- Lexington Fayette County Food & Beverage Ass'n v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Stone v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.