Legal Opinion

Hislop v. Rodgers

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1939No. Civil No. 4144PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

— Roy R. Hislop, E. O. Moore and W. O. Click, as city manager, chief of police and city magistrate, respectively, of the City of Phoenix, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called petitioners, filed an original application in this court for a writ of prohibition against G. A. RODGERS as a judge of the superior court of Maricopa county, hereinafter called respondent. An alternative writ was issued requiring the respondent to show cause why it should not be made permanent, and a response was duly made and the matter submitted to us upon the petition and the response.

As preliminary to a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. North American Cold Storage Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Yates v. MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Lawton v. . SteeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. People Ex Rel. Copcutt v. . Board of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Crane Co. v. Arizona State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. City of Tucson v. Tucson Sunshine Climate ClubArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Arizona Public Service Co. v. Southern Union Gas Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Arizona State Land Department v. McFateArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Town of Paradise Valley v. Gulf Leisure Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API