Legal Opinion
Commonwealth Department of Corrections v. Tate
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 8, 2016No. 614 M.D. 2014PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge ANNE E. COVEY.
Amos Tate (Tate), pro se,. filed an Amended Petition for .Review (Amended Petition) in this Court’s original jurisdiction, wherein he challenges deductions the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (Department) made from his inmate account and seeks damages for emotional distress. 3 The Department filed preliminary objections to dismiss Tate’s Amended Petition pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure Number 1028(a)(4) due to its failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted (demurrer). Specifically, the Department avers that (1) Tate,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Montanez v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Kull v. GuisseCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Pennsylvania State Lodge, Fraternal Order of Police v. Commonwealth, Department of Conservation & Natural ResourcesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Williams v. StickmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bundy, K., Aplt v. WetzelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- A. Johnson v. J. Wetzel, Secretary PA. D.O.C.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- B. Sherwood v. PA DOCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- C.S. Lambing v. DOCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- C.S. Lambing v. DOCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.