Legal Opinion
James v. Quinlan
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 30, 1989No. 88-5582PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VAN DUSEN, Senior Circuit Judge.
I
Plaintiffs-appellants, Raymond Edward James and Daniel Carlton Freeland, inmates at the United States Penitentiary at Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, bring this suit which challenges the constitutionality of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Inmate Financial Responsibility Program and argues that it was not enacted in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 500 et seq. Plaintiffs also argue on appeal that the district court erred by not ordering that they be provided with a copy of unpublished district court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Montanye v. HaymesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Albert Garza v. Harold G. Miller, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Charles Mack v. Warden Loretto FCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Leonard G. Tillman v. Lebanon County Correctional Facility Robert L. Raiger, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Reynolds v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Johnson v. RowleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Carter v. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.