Cardenas v. Varner
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice.
Jack and Joyce Varner sued Jose and Gloria Cardenas to recover upon a promissory note and foreclose upon a vendor’s lien securing payment of the note. The Cardenas executed the note as partial payment for ranch land bought from the Var-ners. When the Cardenas discovered, after closing of the sale, that the acreage was less than that represented by the Var-ners, they refused to pay the outstanding note balance. This precipitated the aforementioned suit. In response, the Cardenas counterclaimed for breach of the sales con tract and warranties, asserting that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- HOLY CROSS CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST v. WolfTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Cunningham v. Parkdale BankTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Hruska v. First State Bank of DeanvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Natural Gas Clearinghouse v. Midgard Energy Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Varner v. CardenasTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Texas Entertainment Ass'n v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Juan Alberto Rey and Roberto Alvarez-Rey v. Carlos Lara and Benito Lara, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- Juan Alberto Rey and Roberto Alvarez-Rey v. Carlos Lara and Benito Lara, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- Phillip Wilson and Laura Wilson// Neoma Whetstone v. Neoma Whetstone// Phillip Wilson and Laura Wilson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.