Legal Opinion

Varner v. Cardenas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2007No. 06-0212PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Per curiam

We recently held in Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. v. Chapa that a prevailing party must segregate recoverable from unrecoverable attorney’s fees in all cases. 212 S.W.3d 299, 313 (Tex.2006). The court of appeals here correctly reversed and remanded for segregation; but as it defined recoverable fees too narrowly, we modify its judgment.

The Varners sold a ranch to the Carde-nases in December 1997 in return for cash and a promissory note. The note provided for ten annual installments due each December. The Cardenases paid the first installment in December 1998, but no others. In response to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. and Brien Garcia v. Nury ChapaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. HOLY CROSS CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST v. WolfTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. International Security Life Insurance Co. v. SprayTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Cardenas v. Varner, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. 7979 Airport Garage, L.L.C. v. Dollar Rent a Car Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  2. Wayne Ventling v. Patricia M. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Owens v. Ousey, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  4. Hatfield v. Solomon, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  5. Editorial Caballero, S.A. De C v. v. Playboy Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2012

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API