Legal Opinion

Texas Entertainment Ass'n v. Combs

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 2014No. 03-12-00527-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCOTT K. FIELD, Justice.

This case concerns the constitutionality of subchapter B of chapter 102 of the Business and Commerce Code, which requires certain sexually oriented businesses to pay the State an amount equal to $5 for each customer who is admitted into each business. See Tex. Bus. & Com.Code §§ 102.052-.056; see also Combs v. Texas Entm’t Ass’n, Inc., 287 S.W.3d 852, 856-57 (Tex.App.-Austin 2009, pet. granted) (discussing operation of sexually-oriented-business tax). On original submission, this Court affirmed the trial court’s judgment that this statute—which we refer to as…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. SummersTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Bentley v. BuntonTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Davenport v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Combs v. Texas Small Tobacco CoalitionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  2. Auspro Enterprises, LP v. Texas Department of Transportation, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  3. Cesar Diaz-Frances v. 115 Blanco LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2024
  4. Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas And Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas v. Autohaus LP, LLP, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  5. Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts v. Texas BLC, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API