Dale Tile Manufacturing Co. v. Hyatt
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO TOE CITY COURT OF NEW YORK. The original action was brought in a court of the State of New York by Elizabeth A. L. Hyatt, a citizen of New York, and the owner of letters patent for an. improvement in illuminated basement. and basement-extensions, against the Hale Tile Manufacturing Company (Limited), a corporation organized by the laws of New York, upon a written agreement between the parties,- dated December 28, 1880, which contained, either in itself, or by…
Read the full summary
ERROR TO TOE CITY COURT OF NEW YORK. The original action was brought in a court of the State of New York by Elizabeth A. L. Hyatt, a citizen of New York, and the owner of letters patent for an. improvement in illuminated basement. and basement-extensions, against the Hale Tile Manufacturing Company (Limited), a corporation organized by the laws of New York, upon a written agreement between the parties,- dated December 28, 1880, which contained, either in itself, or by reference to previous agreements, the following provisions: The agreement began by reciting that letters patent for this…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray
The defendant contended in the courts of New York that those courts had no jurisdiction, because the plaintiff’s right to maintain her action depended upon the question whether the second reissue of her patent was valid or invalid under the. patent law.s of the United States, and that of that question the courts of the United States hád exclusive jurisdiction. The judgments of each court of the • State, holding that the question of the validity of that reissue could not be contested in this action, and assuming jurisdiction to render judgment against the defendant, necessarily involved a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Murdock v. City of MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Philadelphia Fire Assn. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- James G. Wilson v. George A. Sanford and Robert G. MusgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Hartell v. TilghmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Albright v. TeasSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sola Electric Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Pratt v. Paris Gas Light & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Luckett v. Delpark, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.