Legal Opinion
L. A. Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. Falls
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 1940No. Docket No. 76, Calendar No. 41,033PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.
Plaintiff, a Michigan corporation, engaged in the manufacture of spring and wire products, brings this bill in equity to have defendants declared trustees ex maleficio of approximately $269,000 and of certain patents covering improved methods of making seat and back springs for automobile cushions. Plaintiff’s bill of complaint sets forth:
One Stackhouse was an inventor and employee of plaintiff. During the summer and fall of 1928 he designed and constructed a device for the improvement of springs in automobile cushions and mattresses. This improvement and invention was known to defendants…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Pratt v. Paris Gas Light & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Becher v. Contoure Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Devine v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- L. A. Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. FallsMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- A & C ENGINEERING CO. v. AtherholtMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Moore v. GloverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Minatronics Corp. v. Buchanan Ingersoll P.C., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.