Hartell v. Tilghman
Supreme Court of the United States
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller
This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in which Tilghman, the appellee, describes himself in his bill as a citizen of that State, and the defendants as citizens of the same State. It thus appears affirmatively that, if the court had jurisdiction of the case, it was for some other reason than the citizenship of the parties; and it is argued by appellants that there is no such other ground for the jurisdiction.
The counsel for appellee, however, insists that it is “ a case arising under the patent laws of the United States,” and therefore…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- James G. Wilson v. George A. Sanford and Robert G. MusgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Blanchard v. SpragueU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1859
- Goodyear v. Union India Rubber Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1857
- Hill v. WhitcombU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Pratt v. Paris Gas Light & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Luckett v. Delpark, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Excelsior Wooden Pipe Co. v. Pacific Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Heaton-Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Eureka Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.