Legal Opinion

Tucker Et Vir. v. Pgh. Railways Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1943No. Appeals, 64 and 65PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This case involves an action of trespass brought by Margaret Tucker and her husband for injuries sustained by the wife while a passenger on one of defendant’s street cars. The defendant has appealed from a refusal by the lower court of its motion for judgment non obstante veredicto. On April .25, 1938, at about 5:15 p. mv the plaintiff and two of her co-employees, the witnesses Miss Alma Fabeny and Miss Edith Griffith, boarded one of defendant’s outbound street cars in North Side, Pittsburgh. The car was crowded and the three were forced to stand in the aisle, about…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith Et Ux. v. Pittsburghi Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. McClusky v. Shenango Val. Traction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Harkins v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Uffelman v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Zieger v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Watson v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Myers v. Kaufmann Department Stores, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API