State v. Luther
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*3CAMPBELL, J.
The defendant’s conviction for second degree manslaughter was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. The defendant petitioned this court for review, assigning as his sole point relied on for reversal:
“If a witness in a criminal case has been subjected to hypnosis regarding the subject matter of her testimony, evidence, such as by cross-examination, of what occurred during the hypnosis is admissible.”
We granted the defendant’s petition for review to decide the issue suggested,1 but now find that we must first decide whether the defendant protected his record and preserved the alleged…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Commonwealth v. NazarovitchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- State v. JorgensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- People v. TaitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ali Shamaeizadeh v. Joel CuniganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- State v. AffeldOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Burton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. FordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.