Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Continental Pipe Line Co. v. Belle Fourche Pipeline Co.

District Court, D. Wyoming

Decided March 27, 1974No. C-74-20PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE’S MEMORANDUM

KERR, Judge.

Continental Pipeline Company (Continental) has brought this action against Belle Fourche Pipeline Company (Belle Fourche) seeking injunctive relief. A motion for a temporary restraining order was previously overruled. Belle Fourche filed a motion to dismiss and after a hearing on the motion to dismiss and on the application for a permanent injunction, the Court took the matter under advisement.

The operative facts in this case are not in dispute. Continental is a Delaware corporation, qualified to do business in Wyoming with its principal place of business in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Union Pacific Resources Co. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. McNeill v. Park County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API