Legal Opinion

Swift Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Hightstown

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 8, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainant's bill is to quiet title, under the statute. The jurisdictional facts are duly proven and not contested. Indeed, none of the facts are in dispute.

On and prior to October 18th, 1924, Charles H. Davison owed four debts of several thousand dollars each — one to defendant First National Bank of Hightstown, one to defendant Farmers' National Bank of Allentown and two to complainant, Swift Company. On that day, his wife joining, he conveyed his farm — located part in Mercer county and part in Monmouth county — to an intermediary, Morrison, who immediately reconveyed to Davison and his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Clement v. KaighnNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1862
  2. Lippincott v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  3. Kinmonth v. WhiteNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1901
  4. Williams v. BakerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1902
  5. Pillsbury v. KingonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vineland Savings & Loan Assn. v. FelmeyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  2. Campbell v. DrozdowiczWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Matter of SilvermanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
  4. Smith v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  5. Genz v. Hallmark Cards, Inc. (In re Silverman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API