Clement v. Kaighn
New Jersey Court of Chancery
The facts of this case sufficiently appear by the opinion of the Chancellor. The case was argued ex parte by
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
By the interlocutory decree in this cause, it was referred to one of the masters of the court to ascertain and report the amount duo to the complainant, and also the amount due, if anything, to sundry creditors upon judgments specified in the bill of complaint, and also to ascertain and report the order and priority of the said mortgage and judgments.
The master reports that Stephen Coulter, one of the defendants, recovered judgment against Charles Kaighn, the *54mortgagor, in the Supreme Court, on the 'twenty-third of January, 1858, upon which judgment there appeared to be due, at…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Vineland Savings & Loan Assn. v. FelmeyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Silver v. WilliamsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Burg v. EdmondsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Borromeo v. DIFLORIONew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Swift Co. v. First Nat. Bank of HightstownNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.