Legal Opinion

Williams v. Baker

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 1, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On bill for injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

Emery, V. C.

The general equitable rule upon which jurisdiction in this case is invoked is that of declaring a deed, which was, on its face, an .absolute conveyance, to have been merely a mortgage to indemnify the grantee against liabilities assumed by him and another for one of the grantors, and to have the mortgage canceled, because the grantees have been relieved from the liability against .which they were secured. At the hearing I decided that the proofs sustained this claim as to the character of the transaction and as to the discharge of the grantees from liability. The parties…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Woods v. SpoturnoSuperior Court of Delaware · 1936
  3. Bradford v. CulbrethSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
  4. Swift Co. v. First Nat. Bank of HightstownNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  5. Raub v. LemonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API