Hannah & Lay Mercantile Co. v. Hartzell
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wexford; Aldrich, J. Bill by the Hannah & Lay Mercantile Company against 5. E. Hartzell, Charles H. Bostick, and others to enforce a mechanic’s lien. From a decree for complainant, defendant Bostick appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This bill was filed to enforce a lien for materials furnished to S. E. Hartzell, a contractor and builder, in putting up a building for Charles H. Bostick, in Wexford county. The'contract price was $2,388. The building was completed about August 1, 1898, and Bostick went into the occupancy thereof. To secure its claim, complainant filed the statutory statement of lien within the proper time upon the lands and building of which Bostick was the owner. The property was described in the bill as “the west twenty-five feet off from lot twenty-one, and the west twenty-five feet off from the north…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smalley v. GearingMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Fairbairn v. MoodyMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Jossman v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grand River Lumber & Coal Co. v. GlennMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Acme Lumber Co. v. Modern Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Corbitt v. LoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- J. E. Greilick Co. v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Frank Japes Co. v. Pagel.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.