J. E. Greilick Co. v. Rogers
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Grand Traverse; Mayne, J. ■ Bill by the J. E. Greilick Company against George Mills Rogers and Charles Schumacher to enforce a mechanic’s lien. From a decree for complainant, defendant. Rogers appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, C. J.
This is a proceeding in chancery under the mechanic’s lien law of this State brought by complainant to enforce a lien against the premises of defendant Rogers for material furnished and used in the erection of buildings thereon. Defendant Schumacher was the principal contractor. Complainant obtained a decree in the lower court. Defendant Rogers appeals, and asks us to reverse that decree for several reasons.
1. The statement of lien was not served on appellant per*315sonally, but was served on his wife — whom complainant claims was his agent in charge of the premises — the ninth day after the same…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smalley v. GearingMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Fairbairn v. MoodyMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Hannah & Lay Mercantile Co. v. HartzellMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zilz v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Vaughan v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Godfrey Lumber Co. v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Sheldon v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Frank Japes Co. v. Pagel.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929