Legal Opinion
Mohr v. Sands
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 7, 1957No. [No. 129, October Term, 1956.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bruñe, C. J.,
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Mrs. Dorothy Marie Mohr, one of the plaintiffs-appellants, entered into an agreement to purchase a new 1955 Nash automobile under a conditional sales contract from Suburban Nash, Inc. (referred to below as “Suburban”), dated June 6, 1955. A few days later Mrs. Mohr’s conditional sales contract was assigned for value to Universal C.I.T. Credit Corporation (referred to below as “C.I.T.”), with a repurchase agreement; and the contract was duly recorded on June 9, 1955, among the Chattel Records of Baltimore City. On July 27, 1955, the Department of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tripp v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Praeger v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Dinsmore v. Maag-Wahmann Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Finance & Guaranty Co. v. Defiance Motor Truck Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Winakur v. SapournCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mohr v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Automobile Acceptance Corp. v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Baltimore Transit Employees' Credit Union v. ThorneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Huettner v. Savings Bank of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Government Employees Insurance v. CoppageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.