Legal Opinion

Praeger v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 14, 1914PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Allegany County, in Equity (Henderson, J.). The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas, L,

delivered the opinion of the Court,

On the 13th day of March, 1913, the appeliee.was appointed 1 y the Circuit Court for Allegany County receiver for Stanley C. Llewllyn and Oscar M. Llewllyn, co-partners, trading as the Earmers’ Supply Company. Thereafter the appellant, the Emerson-Brantingham Implement Company, a body corporate, filed a petition in the cause in which the receiver was appointed alleging that the said Implement Company, in the month of November, 1912, placed in the hands of the Farmer’s Supply Company twenty buggies under the terms of a contract whereby it was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Booth v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Donaldson v. FarwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Dyson v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  4. Gaither v. StockbridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  5. Central Trust Co. v. Arctic Ice Machine Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. BiggsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. Tatlebaum v. Pantex Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  3. Plaza Corp. v. Alban Tractor Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Williams v. MessickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  5. Washington Mutual Bank v. HomanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API