Legal Opinion

Automobile Acceptance Corp. v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 13, 1958No. [No. 124, September Term, 1957.]PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bruñe, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

An automobile dealer, Suburban Nash, Inc., on July 5', 1955, sold a used car to a customer, F. D. Thomas, under a contract of conditional sale which the customer duly executed, and Suburban Nash assigned the contract to the appellee, Universal C.I.T. Credit Corporation (“C.I.T.”). On the next day, in some manner not disclosed by the evidence, Suburban Nash induced the customer to sign another contract of conditional sale, and Suburban Nash assigned the second contract to the appellant, Automobile Acceptance Corporation (“Auto Acceptance”).…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co. v. KlauderSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Kirkwood v. Provident Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  3. C. I. T. Corp. v. GuySupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  4. Tatlebaum v. Pantex Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  5. Thomas Roberts & Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Loker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  2. Plaza Corp. v. Alban Tractor Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Picking v. State Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Middlebrook Tech, LLC v. MooreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Hawkins v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API