Legal Opinion

State v. Oakes

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 7, 2010No. 2009-145PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

The defendant, Harold Oakes, appeals his conviction on two counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault and one count of felonious sexual assault. See RSA 632-A:2 (2007) (amended 2008); RSA 632-A:3 (2007) (amended 2008). He argues that the Superior Court (Bomstein, J.) erred by: (1) denying his motion to dismiss for insufficient evidence; (2) denying his motion to compel depositions; (3) permitting the State to amend the indictments; (4) granting the State’s motion to exclude evidence of the victim’s prior and subsequent allegations of sexual assault; (5) granting the State’s motion to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. William Peter KampilesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  2. State v. DellorfanoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. United States v. Johnson, RichardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  4. People v. JeffersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. ChickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  2. State v. Jose Batista-SalvaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
  3. State v. AlwardtSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  4. State v. WilmotSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  5. In re D.B.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API