Legal Opinion

People v. Cady

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1968No. Crim. 4713PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRegan, J.

Defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction ' of a violation of section 285 of the Penal Code (incest), contending he was denied a fair trial in that the trial court failed, sua sponte, to give the jury instructions to view the prosecutrix’ testimony with caution.

It will serve no useful purpose to recite in detail the acts defendant perpetrated upon his 19-year-old daughter, Jean. Suffice it to say the evidence in support of defendant’s guilt is substantial, convincing and in important instances corroborated. The facts set forth in respondent’s brief, at pages 3 to 11, are complete and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. MerriamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People v. McGheeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. People v. SuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. Rincon-PinedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. People v. CadyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API