Legal Opinion

People v. Sutton

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1964No. Crim. 4406PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.

Defendant appeals from judgment of conviction, after jury trial, of violation of section 285, Penal Code, incest, 1 and from the order denying new trial. 2

Question Presented.

Was the failure to give a cautionary instruction, when none was requested by defendant, prejudicial ?

Evidence.

Janice Sutton, the complaining witness and the daughter of the defendant, testified that on August 23, 1960, she accompanied defendant, her father, in a Chevrolet automobile, to check on a winch truck owned by defendant. The truck was kept in a wrecking yard outside Crescent City, California. Defendant left her in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  4. People v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. Rincon-PinedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. MerriamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. CovertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. People v. McKerneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API