People v. Sutton
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.
Defendant appeals from judgment of conviction, after jury trial, of violation of section 285, Penal Code, incest, 1 and from the order denying new trial. 2
Question Presented.
Was the failure to give a cautionary instruction, when none was requested by defendant, prejudicial ?
Evidence.
Janice Sutton, the complaining witness and the daughter of the defendant, testified that on August 23, 1960, she accompanied defendant, her father, in a Chevrolet automobile, to check on a winch truck owned by defendant. The truck was kept in a wrecking yard outside Crescent City, California. Defendant left her in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- People v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. Rincon-PinedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. MerriamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. CovertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- People v. McKerneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.