Legal Opinion

People v. McGhee

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1954No. Crim. 2964PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

The appellant was convicted of the crime of pimping. He appeals from the judgment and the order denying his motion for new trial. The only substantial evidence introduced against appellant came from the complaining witness. Appellant, a Negro, operated a hotel in San Francisco. The complaining witness, Claire Strange, a white woman, went to live in this hotel some time in December, 1952, with one Bailey, a Negro. They represented themselves as husband and wife. They left the hotel in January, 1953.

Miss Strange testified that while in the hotel she was called to the lobby on 15 or 20 occasions…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  3. People v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People v. AnthonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. People v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. Rincon-PinedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. MerriamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. FreytasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. In Re Jess Ex Rel. MorelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. FreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API