Central Contracting Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge.
This is a diversity (?) 1 action arising out of a contractual dispute between the plaintiff, as painting subcontractor, and C. E. Youngdahl & Company, Inc.—Crump, Incorporated—Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc. (a joint venture), the prime contractor, involving plaintiff’s claim of $63,-405.87 as compensation for certain painting “extras” and/or corrective work required of it in the construction of the North View Heights housing project here in Pittsburgh. 2 Defendant is a surety for the prime contractor and in that capacity furnished both a “Performance Bond” and a “Labor and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. SzukhentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gilbert v. BurnstineNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Central Contracting Co. v. C. E. Youngdahl & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Wm. H. Muller & Co., Inc. v. Swedish American Line Ltd. And Transatlantic Steamship Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Moseley v. Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Central Contracting Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Knecht, Inc. v. United Pacific Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. SandersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
- United States ex rel. Ray Gains, Inc. v. Essential Construction Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1966
- Barton v. Bechtel Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.