Legal Opinion

In re the Application for Disbarment of Bartlett

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1924No. File No. 4799PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPoll'Ey, J.

This is an original proceeding, brought on behalf of the state for the purpose of disbarring the above-named respondents, L. T. Van Slyke and A. L. Bartlett, two regularly licensed attorneys of this court. The complaint filed by the Attorney General sets out four separate charges. The first is designated as the Cochrane charge against respondents jointly, while the other three charges, designated as the Briggs charge, the Glennon charge, and the Pecor charge, are against Van Slyke individually.

*209The matter was referred to C. O. Bailey, a practicing member of the bar, with directions to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re LentzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  2. Cochrane v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re GoodrichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  2. In re Application for Disbarment of WaggonerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. In re WaggonerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API