In re Lentz
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rule to show cause why Carl Lentz should not be disbarred or suspended from his profession.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dixon, J.
On October 9th, 1899, a rule was entered requiring Carl Lentz, an attorney and counsellor of this court,, to show cause why he should not be disbarred or suspended from the practice of his profession, because of his unprofessional conduct with respect to certain matters charged in the rule. The attorney-general was appointed to prosecute-the rule, and it was ordered that proofs should be taken concerning the charges. This rule 'is now brought for final determination on the evidence submitted.
The first charge is that, in January, 1893, Henry E.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re DampierIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
- McCord v. State Ex Rel. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- In Re SteenMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
- Metzger v. O'DonoghueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- In Re SteffensenUtah Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.