Hambright & Walsh Co. v. Provident Pledge Corp.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This was an action to recover possession of certain personal property title to which, as alleged, was vested in plaintiff.
Plaintiff was a wholesale dealer or jobber in the sale of jewelry. One C. P. Osgood was engaged in the retail jewelry business and on occasions found customers who desired to purchase goods which he did not carry in stock. Prom time to time he applied to plaintiff for such articles, which it intrusted to him upon consignment thereof and if they were sold or retained by him they were either paid for or a charge made against him for the same; otherwise they were returned to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Murphy v. StellingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
3Cited by2 opinions
- California Jewelry Co. v. Provident Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- City of Signal Hill v. WyseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935