Legal Opinion
California Jewelry Co. v. Provident Loan Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 29, 1935No. Civ. 8854PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHINN, J., pro tem.
In this action of claim and delivery to recover possession of one emerald-cut diamond ring and one emerald-cut loose diamond, or their value, defendants had judgment and plaintiff appeals.
The case arose out of the following facts: Plaintiff was in the wholesale jewelry business at San Francisco and Los Angeles. Defendant Provident Loan Association was in the business of loaning money upon pledges of personal property. One Kaplan was a trafficker in jewelry and precious stones. He received the property from plaintiff and on the same day pledged the same to defendant.
The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Swim v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Green v. WachsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Luitweiler Pumping Engine Co. v. Ukiah Water & Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Soltau v. . GerdauNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Amen v. Merced County Title Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Ermolieff v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and L. E. Dixon Company v. Van Harris, an Individual, Doing Business as Harris & Sons, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and L. E. Dixon Company v. Paramount Truck Rental, Inc., and Van Harris, an Individual Doing Business as Harris & Sons, Paramount Truck Rental, Inc. v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and L. E. Dixon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Beatty v. Oakland Sheet Metal Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Dallman Supply Co. v. Smith-Blair, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.