Legal Opinion
Perez v. Rousseau
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 5, 1993No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff was involved in an automobile accident with defendant Rousseau on August 11, 1986, and with defendant Hobler on February 18, 1987. She commenced two separate actions, alleging that she had suffered a serious injury. The actions were tried together and the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants, finding that plaintiff had not sustained a serious injury. Plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict was denied. She appeals from that order and from the judgments dismissing her complaints and contends that the jury’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Harris v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- S. Kornblum Metals Co. v. Intsel Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Petrovski v. FornesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Kupfer v. DaltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Noble v. AckermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Reynolds v. BurgheziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Greene v. Frontier Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Noble v. AckermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Perez v. HoblerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993