Reynolds v. Burghezi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously reversed in the exercise of discretion and on the law without costs and new trial granted. Memorandum: William Weisbeck, Niagara Fron*942tier Transportation Authority and Niagara Frontier Transit Metro System, Inc. (defendants), contend that they were deprived of a fair «trial by various improprieties committed by plaintiffs attorney on summation and that they are therefore entitled to a new trial on both liability and damages. We conclude that the interests of justice require a retrial against all defendants on both liability and damages (see, Stanton v Clegg, 278 App Div…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Clarke v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Kupfer v. DaltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Lemberger v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Rodriguez v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ruddock v. HappellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Noble v. AckermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Mascia v. OliviaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Potter v. Jay E. Potter Lumber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Stewart v. Olean Medical Group, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.